The LSA Ethics Committee recommends these additional materials for linguists on the intersection between language scholarship and ethics. 

Related LSA Ethics Statements, Guidelines, and Related Materials

• Linguistic Society of America ‘Code of Ethics for Linguists in Forensic Linguistic Consulting’ (2011)

• Linguistic Society of America ‘Guidelines on Ethics for LSA Publications and Conferences’ 

• Linguistic Society of America ‘Human Subjects in Linguistic Research’ (1992)

• Linguistic Society of America ‘Resolution: Sign Languages’ (2001)

• Linguistic Society of America and the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s Science and Human Rights Coalition ‘Linguistics and Human Rights’ webinar (2015)

• Linguistic Society of America Civility Policy (2017) [renamed LSA Meeting Conduct Policy]

• Linguistic Society of America Criteria for Nomination and Selection of LSA Fellows (2019)

• Linguistic Society of America Revised Ethics Statement, final version (approved July 2019) 

• Linguistic Society of America Report of the Professional Conduct Task Force (including survey data) (2020)

Ethics Statements, Guidelines, and Related Materials of Other Linguistic Organizations

• Austin Principles for Data Citation in Linguistics (2018)

• British Association for Applied Linguistics ‘Recommendations on Good Practice in Applied Linguistics’ (2016)

• Sign Language Linguistics Society ‘SLLS Ethics Statement for Sign Language Research’ (2014) 

Ethics Statements, Guidelines, and Related Materials of Neighboring Disciplines

• American Anthropological Association ‘Methods and Ethics’ (2016)

• American Anthropological Association ‘Policy on Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault’ (2018)  

• American Anthropological Association ‘Principles of Ethical Responsibility’ (2012)

• Association of Internet Researchers ‘Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research 2.0: Recommendations from the AOIR Ethics Working Committee’ (2012)

• American Psychological Association ‘A Graduate Student’s Guide to Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship Order’ (2006)

• American Psychological Association ‘Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct’ (2017)

• American Sociological Association ‘Anti-Harassment Resources’ (2018)

Ethics Statements, Guidelines, and Related Materials of Other Academic Organizations

• American Association for the Advancement of Science: Misconduct or Ethics Breach (2018)

• American Association for the Advancement of Science ‘#TimesUpAAAS Leshner Fellows Letter on AAAS Harassment Policy’ (2018)

• Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences Research Council of Canada Tri-Council Policy Statement ‘Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans’ (2010) 

• Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines (2003-2018)

• Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Code of Conduct (1999-2011)

• Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) ‘What Constitutes Authorship?’ (2014)

• Council of Science Editors’ ‘White Paper on Publication Ethics’

• Council on Undergraduate Research Code of Ethics (2017)

• IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems (2019)

• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) ‘Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals’ 

• National Science Foundation Frequently Asked Questions and Vignettes:

Interpreting the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects for

Behavioral and Social Science Research 

• National Science Foundation: Measures to Protect Research Community from Harassment (2018)

• Open Society Framework ‘Guidelines for Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) in Journal Policies and Practices’ (2011-18)

• Publication Ethics

• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization ‘Ethics and Intangible Cultural Heritage’ (2015)

• United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’ (1966)

• U.S. Department of Human and Health Services ‘Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (‘Common Rule’)’ (2016) 

• U. S. Department of Human and Health Services ‘International Compilation of Human Research Standards’ (2017) 

• U.S Department of Health and Human Services: The Office of Research Integrity

• U.S. Department of Human and Health Services ‘Protection of Human Subjects’ Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations (2009) 

• United States National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research ‘The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research’ (1979)

• Value-Sensitive Design, a theoretical and methodological framework for the design of technology that is grounded in human values (2009)

• World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) ‘Policy Statement on Geopolitical Intrusion on Editorial Decisions’ (2004)

• World Medical Association ‘Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects’ (2018)